lookihoney.blogg.se - Music manuscript paper word document template

What can I do if I notice that some of the peer review history is missing? Transparent peer review is applied after publication where the associated editor’s decision letter, anonymous reviewers’ comments and authors’ response are published. Double-anonymised peer review applies before publication, where the identity and affiliation of the authors is kept anonymous from the reviewers during the peer-review process. Transparent peer review is compatible with both single-anonymised and double-anonymised peer review. What about journals that offer double-anonymised peer review? Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose otherwise by including their name in their comments to the author.

We take the reviewers’ right to remain anonymous very seriously. Reviewers’ comments are published anonymously. Reviewers cannot opt out, unless there are very exceptional circumstances, which should be discussed and agreed with the editor. Can reviewers opt out of transparent peer review?īy agreeing to review for a journal that offers transparent peer review, reviewers must agree to have their reviewer comments published, if the author selects transparent peer review. Authors can change their mind about transparent peer review at any point prior to acceptance. Yes, authors opt-in to transparent peer review during the submission process. Is transparent peer review optional for authors? We are actively consulting with our Editorial Boards and journal communities and expect many of our journals to start offering transparent peer review soon. Not yet, but the number of journals offering it is growing. Is transparent peer review available on all Royal Society of Chemistry journals?

It may encourage higher-quality and more constructive reviewer comments.

It showcases the hard work and effort of the editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript, and of the authors in revising their work in response.

Readers can learn from the editors’ and reviewers’ insights, and the published peer reviews can serve as an educational tool for those new to peer review.

Increased transparency in editorial decision-making.

Transparent peer review serves to shed light on the aspects of the journal publication process that are usually hidden. Transparent peer review is an important strand of our commitment to open science. The Royal Society of Chemistry supports the principles of open science, which include working towards a more open and transparent research culture. After the appeal process the editor's decision is final. Through the appeal process further opinion is sought on the manuscript's suitability for publication in the journal.

the conclusions drawn by the manuscript are well known or have been published previously.Īuthors are also expected to abide by the Royal Society of Chemistry’s ethical guidelines as described in Author responsibilities.Īuthors have the right to appeal against any decision taken on their manuscript at any stage an appeal would be granted at the discretion of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

the manuscript has already been reviewed and rejected by a different Royal Society of Chemistry journal, and the author(s) have made little or no attempt to address the advice that the editor and/or referees have provided already.

the quality of the English in the manuscript is so poor as to render the science presented unclear.

the manuscript contains redundant information or significant amounts of material that has already been published elsewhere or is under consideration by another journal.

the manuscript represents undue fragmentation of the research into multiple papers.the novelty of the work falls below that required for the journal.the manuscript is of insufficient general interest for the journal and would be better suited to a more specialised journal.the work is of poor scientific quality such that it is clearly not suitable for publication in a scientific journal.the manuscript clearly falls outside the scope of the journal.This process provides a rapid decision to authors of those papers that are unsuccessful and reduces the burden on the reviewers.Ī manuscript may be returned to the author(s) without external review if, in the opinion of the editor(s), one or more of the following apply: Only those manuscripts that pass this initial review process will be forwarded to reviewers for further consideration. In order to meet this aim, submitted manuscripts undergo initial evaluation by an editor to ensure that they meet essential criteria for publication in the journal. We are committed to publishing high quality new work that makes a significant contribution within the scope of its journals.